Criticism of how to prove personal opinions in cyberspace

Interview with Mohammad Hossein Adib

How should we prove our point?

Research from the University of Tokyo shows that in 72% of Japanese families, they use the Euclidean method to prove their theory.

In Euclidean method, one rejects his rival theory and rules his theory correctly

According to a study by the University of Tokyo, 19% of the reasons for divorce in Japanese families are Euclidean, meaning that a man rejects his wife's views and rules his theory correctly.

Rejection of a competitor theory does not mean that the speaker theory is correct

In the Dutch cyberspace, 10,000 methods of proving the validity of a theory have been analyzed. In 37% of cases, the Euclidean method has been used.

The key to success in business is preparation for teamwork, but Johnson, a professor of success in the Netherlands, writes that people work in teamwork. When he succeeds, when he proves that the rival theory is wrong, he does not rule his theory correctly. Such a person is not mentally ready for teamwork

Why do some Iranians have a very negative evaluation of their partnership with others in business? Because, according to Johnson, a person who proves himself in the Euclidean way will be weak in teamwork. According to this researcher, users of Euclidean method in 75% of cases are not able to establish a sincere relationship with others.

How bad others are does not show how good the speaker is

The research team was asked to analyze 100 analyzes about Mohammad Hossein Adib on Instagram and extract the method of proving the user's correctness. In 85% of cases, the Euclidean method was used.

A user who uses the Euclidean method to prove his point does not really show that he is right. Rather, he admits that he is weak in teamwork and proves that in 75% of cases he is not able to establish a sincere relationship with his relatives.

Those who introduce themselves to others are not happy to see this, but it is their own design

In another study, Johnson found that out of 100 bankrupt economic activists, 65 show how wrong others are in proving their beliefs.